Supreme Court rebuts US report on freedom of speech


Written by lawmakers who support President Donald Trump, the report states that Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes committed acts of censorship against freedom of speech in the US by ordering the suspension of social media accounts belonging to Brazilians living in there who are accused of carrying out online attacks against Brazilian institutions.
Notícias relacionadas:
In an official statement, Justice Fachin said the report has “distorted characterizations” of the nature and scope of certain court decisions.He also argued that the Brazilian legal system protects freedom of speech, but that this right is not absolute.
“It is understood that, in certain cases, freedom of speech may exceptionally be subject to specific limitations, particularly when these are necessary to preserve the effectiveness of another fundamental right. Similarly, one cannot invoke the right to freedom of speech to commit crimes defined by law,” he stated.
He also stressed that Justice Moraes’ orders to remove illegal content were issued as part of investigations into digital militias accused of committing crimes against democracy and attempting a coup d’état in Brazil.
“The legal framework established by the 1988 Federal Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, elevates freedom of speech to the status of a preferential right among fundamental rights. Other rights prevail over it only in exceptional cases, under the law, particularly in situations where freedom of expression is invoked to commit crimes defined by the law,” he added.



